By Mark E. Ruquet
The foul-up surrounding the rollout of the Affordable Care
Act has claimed one of its first victims, but he had nothing to do with the design
of the technology at the heart of the administration’s nightmare.
Late last week, Washington D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray
dismissed Insurance Commissioner William P. White after the commissioner
criticized the president’s plan to allow holders of sub-par health insurance
policies to renew the plans for a year.
The New York Times says that Gray released a statement criticizing President Barack Obama’s
plan before clearing it with the mayor. Gray contends that it was normal
procedure for his office to issue statements without clearance.
Gray’s office did not comment.
The Washington Post reports that there were heated exchanges between White and Gray’s office after
the release of the commissioners statement. White went to great lengths to save his job,
but the mayor “lost faith” in the commissioner’s judgment.
PPACA may have cost one commissioner his job, but at least the administration has come to its senses and made a high profile attempt to seek help and advice from the people who have to make sure the plan is ultimately implemented properly: the state insurance commissioners.
On Wednesday, members of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners met with the president and other White House officials to discuss the Administration’s efforts to stem criticism that the president lied when he people they could keep the insurance policy they liked after PPACA took effect.
On Wednesday, members of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners met with the president and other White House officials to discuss the Administration’s efforts to stem criticism that the president lied when he people they could keep the insurance policy they liked after PPACA took effect.
In a statement, NAIC President and Louisiana Commissioner
Jim Donelon said that after working hard to make sure policies were compliant with PPACA, the proposed changes “are
creating a level of uncertainty that we must work together to alleviate.” He added that the commissioners would work to “implement
changes that make sense” while protecting consumers.
The statement was non-committal about what the commissioners
would ultimately decide, which should not be a surprise since not all states
have embraced PPACA and created exchanges for individuals in need of
adequate healthcare coverage, leaving it to the federal exchange to do the
work. In fact, the president’s remedy for extending the pre-PPACA plans is
meeting resistance in some states.
Yesterday, California’s healthcare exchange—Covered
California—rejected extension of non-compliant plans saying doing so
would lend to confusion among consumers and might keep healthy customers out of
the risk pool. Close to 80,000 people have enrolled in California’s exchange,
the Los Angeles Times said, and about 1 million people have non-compliant
policies in the state.
In the end, the insurance commissioners may end-up
inadvertently bailing out the president on this one. The West Virginia
MetroNews said West Virginia has joined a dozen other states in rejecting the president’s
call to extend the non-compliant policies. In essence, the president can say he
came up with a solution, but the commissioners rejected it because it was
unworkable.
A year from now, after they have ironed out the kinks in the
software, and 40 million Americans who never had coverage see the benefits of
the program, this will be forgotten—and replaced by some other immediate
crisis. It’s just a question whether it will be the Republicans or Democrats
who will do a better job of mucking things up.
No comments:
Post a Comment