Monday, September 30, 2013

Stop FEMA Now Protest: One Community's Rally Cry

Janna Tierno, speaking with a reporter at Midland Beach,
Staten Island, N.Y., Stop FEMA Now rally Saturday.
By Mark E. Ruquet

At noon this past Saturday, residents around the country faced with the prospect of burdensome increases in flood insurance premium, gathered to raise attention to an issue that many fear will make coverage unaffordable—and worse. Protesters rallied in New York, New Jersey, Louisiana, anywhere that increases would essentially break the bank of many middle-class homeowners when they go into effect, to tell the Federal Emergency Management Agency (and by extension Congress) to stop the increases.

The word on the street is that some policyholders can expect increases thousands of times what they are currently paying, with no end in sight. If they want to keep rates down, raise the home above flood elevation--which is a lot easier said than done. The rate increases are to be phased in, says FEMA--but that phase in is coming like a freight truck with no brakes. 

Supporters of the law that increases rates, Biggert-Waters, say the premium hikes are necessary to make the Flood Insurance program viable in the future and dissuade development in flood-prone regions. The beneficiaries of the current Flood Insurance plan, they add, are primarily the wealthy. However, in many communities throughout the United States, the people being hardest hit are those that can least afford exorbitant increases and live in homes that existed long before adoption of the program.

Midland Beach, Staten Island, N.Y., suffered greatly in terms of flooding and lives lost. This is a taste of what residents here are feeling.Midland Beach, Staten Island, N.Y., suffered greatly in terms of flooding and lives lost. This is a taste of what residents here are feeling.

Joanna Tierno, spokesperson for Team Staten Island notes, “Our lawmakers talk about creating jobs and a business friendly environment, well there are 5.5 million policyholders in the United States and this is going to be devastating to jobs and the economy.”




 

Friday, September 27, 2013

Where to Grow: D&O for Private Companies & Non-Profits

By Mark E. Ruquet

NEW YORK—Conventional wisdom says the U.S. insurance marketplace has matured to a point where there is little room for growth. Indeed, carriers and agents fight over market share in the personal lines space with promises of lower rates or better service. In the commercial lines space, larger brokers acquire smaller firms or experienced talent to drive revenue while carriers cut rates or offer attractive terms and conditions to entice desirable business to their portfolio.

However, organic growth is still possible outside of dependence on shifting loyalties. For agents, young teens do not want to depend on Mom and Dad for the keys to the car forever. The entrepreneurial spirit can create insurance opportunities with start-ups, driving the need for myriad of coverage. Then there are markets where insurance penetration is surprisingly sparse, and the right coverage pitch and contact can lead to growth opportunities.

Within the independent insurance agent’s sweet-spot is small companies and non-profits, and as Wednesday’s Advisen conference in New York on Management Liability made clear, this is an untapped market for Directors and Officers coverage. All an agent needs to do is convince his or her client that there is a need. One effective strategy for producers is to identify individuals on non-profit boards that understand the need for D&O coverage to convince the rest of the board that there is a need. However, as many speakers attested to, convincing business owners within a family owned business, or board members of a non-profit who do not perceive risks in their decision making can be a hard sell—especially under tight budgets.

Advisen’s report, “The Private Eye: A Spotlight on the U.S. Private D&O Market,” notes that an average of 60 percent of private companies and non-profits with $100 million or more in revenue purchase D&O, while the number drops dramatically to 28 percent for entities with revenues below $100 million. To get a better idea of the market potential, there are 45 million companies registered in the United States. Of that, close to 17 million employ less than 500 people, an indicator of the number of private companies. In addition, the Census Bureau says there are more than 3 million non-profits.       

A major reason for the low take up rate is that small business owners and non-profits do not believe someone would sue them. They do not realize that litigation is costly, running into the millions of dollars in some cases, or the expanding sectors of risk such as cyber-liability, increased government regulation or the unforeseen. The fear of the rising tide of litigation presents opportunity for carriers.      

“It’s a growth market,” said Steve Anderson, an insurance industry executive. He says that despite the poor take-up rate, the industry is “more bullish” about the potential for expansion in D&O for privately held companies and non-profits as institutions face non-traditional risks.

Anderson said some of the unforeseen risks can arise from media attention over the plight of college graduates not securing work in the field they spent years pursuing their degree. The plaintiff’s bar could sue for breach of implied promise when those years of education fail to become a stepping-stone to a better life. Then there is a hospital’s board facing exposure because a patient’s stay in their facility produced an unexpected result.

“No one goes to the hospital with appendicitis and expects to walk away with a staph infection,” Anderson noted.

For buyers, Bob Adler, business administrator for Essex County Legal Aid, observed that small institutions are BOPs with professional legal liability, but carriers do not have the resources to develop the kind of relationship and education of risk they do with their large clients. The premium is too small and the number of policyholders too great. Advisen cites U.S. Census Bureau statistics putting the number of S corporations (family owned businesses) at more than 20 million. However, Adler feels carriers could help to differentiate themselves by making resources available to their customers, such as a dedicated website to give advice and counsel and suggest what risk management practices would help avoid a claim in the future. Where he finds himself turning for help is his broker, says Adler.

“What I look for in a broker is a partner in risk management,” says Adler.

“I want to deal with people who know my business and are in it,” points out Nakeschi Watkins, risk manager for Yeshiva University, adding that “carriers should be a little more aggressive” about getting the business. She says she relies on networking and reputation when choosing whom to deal with, but she too relies on her broker’s expertise in evaluating and purchasing insurance.

Carriers could do more to help with the sale, said Sandy Crystal, executive vice president for the insurance
Christopher Sparro, AIG President, Financial Lines,
U.S. & Canada Region
brokerage firm Crystal & Co. He points out that insurers have worked to make their business more efficient when selling this coverage, but they have not done enough to allow people to understand their risk. Insurers, he adds, should work to differentiate themselves in the eyes of their clients and meet their customer’s needs.

“You shouldn’t do the business if you can’t do the business for that client,” said Crystal.

D&O markets are repositioning, said Christopher Sparro, president, financial lines, U.S. and Canada Region for American International Group, as carriers push D&O prices up and seek to build profit into their books of business. However, carriers cannot expect to expand the business if they don’t supply the service customers need and find ways to differentiate themselves.

“Service, service, learning and education” is what the customer desires, said Sparro. “It is much harder to provide capabilities and service; it is easy to match terms and conditions.”

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

PPACA: If It Don't Work Fix It

By Mark E. Ruquet

I continue to be mystified by the vehement criticism of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as Obamacare) and the absurd tactics critics are employing to obstruct implementation.

I remember before passage of PPACA attending a Town Hall Meeting held by Rep. Frank Pallone, D-NJ. Representatives from all over the country were getting an earful, and while Pallone’s intention was to listen and explain, there was a strong undercurrent of noxious opposition. My personal sense was and remains that those who came to the meeting wanting to know more about healthcare reform gave up and left because they felt there was no room in that raucous atmosphere to have a sensible conversation, leaving the ardent critics to the stage. That is the way it has been since passage of PPACA.

Proponents have done an awful job explaining the program to the public. Critics have done an excellent job demonizing it, harping on suspicions people hold of the federal government’s efficacy and unreliability. Some fear the medical system will fall apart with federal involvement. Others believe government should not mandate the purchase of insurance coverage—in their belief that government is mandating too much already.

The reality is—like it or not—this country’s health insurance system is broken. When 48 million people do not have health insurance, more than 15 percent of the population, there is a problem. When we see a fundraiser held for those hit with a serious disease to help them make ends meet—there is a problem. When companies cut off coverage from spouses because they can obtain their own insurance elsewhere—no matter cost or quality of that plan—there is a problem. When politicians go out of their way to deny people access to affordable health insurance through disinformation and legal obstacles—there is a problem.

The New York Times featured a story about how in Florida, and elsewhere, critics are going to great lengths to deny people access to affordable insurance under PPACA. The insistence that there is some boogeyman waiting in the wings to snatch away personal freedoms and federalize healthcare in this country is a straw man’s argument. The system needs to be overhauled.

Ultimately, there is need to streamline the delivery of healthcare in this country to make it efficient and affordable. Whether that can be accomplished solely through a private sector model or socialized medicine model remains to be seen. One thing for certain, the system cannot remain as is. Healthcare expense is too high, especially when compared to the same quality of care elsewhere in the world, and the profit model does not have the patient’s best interest in mind. Maybe we can find something in between. PPACA is a start. Critics should not be so hell-bent on dismantling the program, but should be genuine critics who recognize what doesn’t work and develop answers to make it work better.


The small cadre of Republican representatives who have the Congress tied-up in knots over defunding PPACA today should be spending their energy developing programs to make healthcare more available to Americans at affordable prices, not putting the country on the path to fiscal ruin. So far, their sole aim is to dismantle the program, but have not offered a single, sensible alternative to help Americans. 

Friday, September 20, 2013

The Truth About Flood Insurance



Communities in New Jersey, New York and Louisiana will join together on Sept. 28 at noon to protest the Flood Insurance rate increases that are hitting struggling middle class homeowners the hardest. Homeowners and business owners in New York and New Jersey continue to recover, and New Orleans is still not back on its feet eight years after Katrina. Now people have to face stiff flood insurance increases that they simply can't afford.

Politicians are running away from responsibility for the increases--but so far, they are not solving the problem.

Mark Ruquet

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Officials Say Seaside Boardwalk Fire Accidental, Caused By Energized Ele...

Seaside Park Fire an Accident

By Mark E. Ruquet

The Ocean County Prosecutors Office says the fire that wiped-out a four block section of boardwalk in Seaside Park and Seaside Heights, N.J., was an accident.

Officials are pinning the blame on Superstorm Sandy, saying wires were damaged from salt water and sand as a result of the floods from the storm. Investigators said the fire began under the boardwalk and sub-floor of the buildings housing Biscayne Candies and Kohr's Ice Cream Stand. Wires under the boardwalk touched and caused an electrical arch that started the blaze. The fact that the wiring dated back to 1970 did not help conditions, they added.

In a statement, officials said they did not want to cause a panic, but warned business and homeowners to inspect and replace any worn and damaged wiring that was subject to flooding.

After sustaining what many thought was a death blow from Superstorm Sandy, the shore businesses were up and running by July, the height of the season. The fire was nothing short of a kick in the stomach to both businesses and residents. Taking the lead, Gov. Chris Christie has pledged $15 million in Superstorm Sandy funds to help rebuild the more than 50 businesses destroyed by the inferno.





Best Industry for Working Mothers? Not P&C Insurers

By Mark E. Ruquet

For working mothers seeking the best companies to work for, the property and casualty insurance industry is not the place for them, according to the 2013 Working Mother 100 Best Companies.

The only P&C insurer to make this year's list was Allstate.

Working Mother said, in part "For a mental and physical tune-up, employees of this financial services and insurance company can visit a new wellness center at headquarters...that holds a medical clinic, pharmacy and lab and offers lifestyle-coaching services.” The company opened another clinic in its second largest office in Irving, Texas. Allstate offers workshops for improving lifestyle and paid time-off of 20 days or more, plus eight holidays.

Life and health insurers are more in tune with employee’s needs. Making the list were Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, MetLife, The Phoenix Companies, Prudential and Mass Mutual.

What makes a company family friendly? Working Mother says it is the combination of benefits and flexible cultures.

“Parent employees get home in time for dinner, working moms get to the C-Suite and paid maternity leave is a given,” the publication says.